The work keeps moving.
It doesn't all need you.

Ubiami keeps work, information and next steps moving — and brings you only what truly needs you. Less of the business has to live in your head.

See a day with Ubiami Get early access Built for teams and companies.
A day with Ubiami

Whose day looks like yours?

Pick one. You'll see their day as it is — and what stops needing them.

Fiona, Elise and William are illustrative, not customers. Their days show the Ubiami experience we are building — some of it available today, some of it product direction. We'll tell you which is which.

Fiona · I serve customers

Thursday at the clinic.

Three people, about twenty-five customers a day. Fiona treats for seven hours and runs the business in the gaps — between customers, in the evening, on Sundays.

  1. 07:10

    Yesterday's 13:00 cancellation was offered to the waiting list overnight and taken in twenty minutes. The chair was never empty.

    Before — noticed when the customer didn't turn up.

    Handled
  2. 07:50

    Today in one line: nine customers, one of them new, nothing left over from yesterday.

    Before — the calendar, read three times a morning.

    Handled
  3. 09:20

    Three new feedback replies. One names it — "good treatment, but I waited fifteen minutes not knowing how long" — for the fourth time this month. A ten-minute gap between appointments is proposed.

    Before — read, wonder whether it's a pattern, move on.

    Fiona's call
  4. 10:00

    Fiona is with customers until five. Nothing below interrupted that.

    Her work
  5. 11:00

    A twenty-second phone video became a week of posts for four channels — in the clinic's own voice, because that voice was described once. Drafts are waiting.

    Before — the agency's draft that didn't sound like her, or 10 pm.

    Needs her OK
  6. 15:30

    Rent is due in nine days and the quarterly insurance lands next month. A prepared proposal: one week of promotion built on add-on services — not discounts.

    Before — "is there enough?" Hard to say.

    Needs her decision
  7. Through the day

    Supplies reordered from what was actually used. A receipt photographed and filed. Next week's cover found one connection away. The month's receipts sent to the accountant, gaps checked.

    Before — a pocket full of receipts and three phone calls.

    In the background
  8. 16:50

    "Open on Saturdays?" — a month-old question. Both therapists answered in their own time. Two views, one real disagreement, side by side for the morning.

    Before — a third attempt at an evening meeting.

    Fiona decides
Ten things happened. Four needed Fiona.The other six were done, filed or found — and are still there to see.

Ubiami carried

  • Remembering the cancellation, the supplies, the rent
  • Turning one video into a week of publishing
  • Asking every customer, and noticing the fourth same answer
  • Filing, compiling, finding the cover

What stayed with Fiona

  • Her customers, and seven hours of treatment
  • Her own voice — every post is hers before it goes out
  • What suits her customers: the ten-minute gap was her call
  • How the clinic runs: Saturdays, cash, the team

The business stays at work. Fiona doesn't have to.

Elise · I lead a team

Tuesday, and Project X is slipping.

Elise leads one of five teams. Her day should be people and direction. Instead it disappears into messages, meetings, finding out what actually happened, and chasing the people who know.

  1. 07:45

    What happened overnight and what waits for her — one paragraph.

    Before — forty messages across four channels, read to find the two that matter.

    Handled
  2. 08:10

    Project X is slipping — delivery two weeks late, and nobody has said why. Elise decides to find out properly, not in a meeting: the right questions go to the project manager and the subcontractor's lead, each in their own language, to answer in their own time.

    Before — book a meeting. Earliest slot everyone can make: Thursday.

    Elise steps in
  3. 10:15

    The answers are in. The reason is one subcontractor's resourcing — not the team. And the real disagreement is visible: split the subcontractor's work, or bring the critical part in-house. Two honest positions, not a loud one.

    Before — in the meeting the PM defends the team, the subcontractor isn't there, and the loudest position wins.

    Elise weighs it
  4. 11:00

    Elise decides: the critical component moves in-house; the subcontractor keeps the non-critical part at lower risk.

    Before — decide alone, later, with half the picture.

    Her decision
  5. 11:05

    The decision became owners, a weekly metric and a checkpoint next Tuesday — and William has the situation: what's wrong, what's being done, how it will be followed. No separate report, no extra meeting.

    Before — write it up, assign it, then brief the boss in a report or another meeting.

    Handled
  6. 13:00

    An hour with a team member who has been quiet for two weeks. The only meeting of the day, and the one that mattered.

    Her work
  7. Through the day

    The weekly status assembled from the team's actual work. Two ownerless tasks found owners. Friday's retro question sent, to be answered when people can.

    Before — Elise's evening.

    In the background
Ten things happened. Three needed Elise.Stepping in, weighing two positions, deciding — and an hour of listening. The rest moved on its own.

Ubiami carried

  • Asking the right people the right questions, in their language
  • Collecting the answers and showing where they disagree
  • Turning a decision into owners, a metric and a date
  • Telling William — without a report

What stayed with Elise

  • Listening to people
  • Understanding the difficult situation
  • Giving direction — the decision was hers
  • Leading the team, one quiet colleague included

Elise led the work. She didn't spend her day chasing it.

William · I'm responsible for the whole

The same Tuesday, one floor up.

William runs the department Elise reports into. He gets more information than anyone — and too little of it in a shape he can decide from.

  1. 08:30

    The portfolio, already assembled from where the work happens: eight initiatives, seven green. Project X isn't — and Elise is already on it.

    Before — five slide decks from five team leads, two weeks old.

    Handled
  2. 09:00

    Two concepts with a complete case each — market, economics, risks, a recommendation — in one view. Both approved.

    Before — forty pages between them. Find the numbers.

    He approves
  3. 09:05

    The proposers know their ideas are moving; the department view is updated for those who need to stay informed. Nobody wrote an announcement.

    Before — email the proposers, remember to tell the other teams.

    Handled
  4. 09:30

    A third concept touches three departments. Not his to decide alone: a two-round question to the other heads, three days to answer, background given neutrally. No meeting.

    Before — the next slot all four can make is in three weeks.

    He asks
  5. 09:45

    A fourth duplicates work done six months ago. Declined — with the link and a contact. The proposer gets a direction, not a no.

    Before — "was this done before?" Nobody remembers who to ask.

    He declines
  6. 10:00

    A fifth is promising but early. Parked until the first metric from the approved work lands — it will come back by itself, with the number attached.

    Before — leave it in the inbox and hope it resurfaces.

    He defers
  7. 11:20

    Project X: what's wrong, what's already being done, how it will be measured. Thirty seconds to read. William doesn't call a meeting — he trusts the work and watches the metric.

    Before — summon the team lead, hear the defence, guess what's actually wrong.

    His judgment
  8. 15:00

    Half an hour with a team lead about next year. Unhurried, because the morning didn't leak into the afternoon.

    His work
  9. Through the day

    The quarter's budget follow-up and next week's steering pre-read assembled from live data. Every decision from the morning reached the people it concerns, at the level of detail that is theirs.

    Before — ask finance and wait; build the deck from last month; hope it got through.

    In the background
Eleven things happened. Five needed William.All five were judgment: approve, ask, decline, defer, trust. None of them was a report.

Ubiami carried

  • Assembling the portfolio and the pre-reads from live work
  • Bringing each concept as a complete, decision-ready case
  • Telling the right people what was decided, at their level
  • Keeping the parked idea and the checkpoint from being forgotten

What stayed with William

  • Judgment — when to trust, and when to look closer
  • Responsibility for what the department bets on
  • Priority: approve, ask, decline, defer
  • The final decisions, every one of them

Trust costs less than control — when the view is clear.

Where two days meet

Work doesn't stop at the edge of a tool.

The same Tuesday morning, seen from two desks. Elise solved a problem with people. William got a decision-ready picture. Nobody wrote a report in between.

Elise · 08:10 – 11:05
The problem, solved with people
  1. Project X is slipping. She steps in.
  2. The right questions reach the right people, in their own language.
  3. The reason comes back: one subcontractor's resourcing.
  4. The real disagreement is on the table. She decides.
  5. The decision becomes owners, a metric, a Tuesday checkpoint.
William · 11:20
The same event, decision-ready
What's wrong
Delivery has slipped two weeks. Cause: a subcontractor's resourcing — not the team.
What's being done
The critical component moves in-house; the subcontractor keeps the non-critical part.
How it's followed
A weekly metric. First checkpoint next Tuesday.
  1. He reads it in thirty seconds, trusts the work, and watches the metric.

Ubiami didn't make Elise faster and William faster. It let what Elise learned become what William needed — in the shape he needed it, at the moment it was true. Information, decisions and responsibility moved through the organisation without anyone carrying them.

The principle

You stay at the centre. Ubiami works in the background.

Three very different days, one shape. Ubiami carries what has to be remembered, gathered, repeated and followed up. People keep what only people can do.

Ubiami carries
  • Remembering
  • Routine coordination
  • Repeated work
  • Gathering information
  • Follow-up
  • Moving approved work forward
What stays with you
  • Customers
  • Creativity
  • Judgment
  • Leadership
  • Relationships
  • Final decisions

Ubiami prepares, summarises, connects and carries an approved decision forward. It does not make the strategic decisions for you — and it isn't built to pretend otherwise.

Getting started

Add only what you want handled.

Ubiami OS and your Concierge are the foundation. The Concierge is the one you talk to — you give it a name that fits your organisation, and it learns a new skill with every area you add. It works within the boundaries of what you're allowed to see, never above them.

From there you add only the areas you want Ubiami to handle. Fiona, Elise and William don't need the same package — and nobody is sold what they won't use.

One person, separate worlds, separate memories. Your company's Ubiami never sees your private life, and a personal assistant would be a separate product with a separate memory. The line between them isn't a setting. It's how the product is built.

FionaFoundation, plus marketing and customer feedback & team decisions. Nothing else.
EliseFoundation, plus decisions, tasks and projects.
WilliamFoundation, plus portfolio and projects — the department view.

Show us your workday.

Tell us what a normal week looks like. We'll show you, honestly, which parts Ubiami can carry today — and which it can't yet.

Get early access

Early access · built for teams and companies